Israel becomes more isolated/ Yemen’s support for Palestine resonates with a resistance against imperialist powers

Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today and former U.S. military official and military analyst talked with Qods News Agency (qodsna) in an exclusive interview about the Zionist regime’s crimes and genocide against Palestinians and international community’s stance against Zionist regime’s crimes as well as Yemen’s Ansarullah support to people of Gaza.

The interview comes as follows:

What should be done to stop Israeli crimes against Palestinians?

International Accountability: The international community must hold Israel accountable for its violations of international law. This can be done through various channels, such as the United Nations, international criminal courts, and targeted sanctions by states. For example, efforts to hold Israel accountable in the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes have been an essential step in challenging its actions.

Diplomatic Pressure: Governments, especially those with strong political and economic ties to Israel, must exert diplomatic pressure to end the blockade on Gaza, ensure humanitarian access, and halt the military campaign. The global community must push for negotiations and a return to a meaningful peace process, which includes addressing the root causes of the conflict, including occupation, displacement, and human rights violations.

Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS): The BDS movement, which calls for a boycott of Israeli goods, divestment from Israeli companies, and sanctions on Israel until it complies with international law and human rights standards, is an option to consider. It’s a non-violent form of resistance that seeks to exert pressure on Israel to change its policies.

How can the international community help Palestinians get rid of the Israeli occupation?

The international community has a significant role to play in supporting Palestinians in their struggle for self-determination. This includes:

Supporting Palestinian Rights: International recognition of Palestinian statehood and the protection of Palestinians’ right to self-determination can put pressure on Israel. Supporting the Palestinian Authority and institutions in building a functional state and economy, while ensuring human rights protections, is crucial.

Sanctions on Israel: Targeted sanctions on Israeli officials and companies involved in human rights abuses and the illegal settlement expansion would be an effective tool in pressuring Israel to change its policies.

Advocacy for the Two-State Solution: While the two-state solution seems increasingly difficult to achieve due to settlement expansions and other factors, pushing for negotiations under international supervision could still play a role in resolving the conflict, provided that it includes significant rights and protections for Palestinians.

Humanitarian Aid: Increasing humanitarian aid and ensuring it reaches Gaza and the West Bank without interference can help alleviate the immediate suffering of the Palestinian people while fostering resilience in the face of occupation.

The international community must stop turning a blind eye to the injustices Palestinians face and take real, substantive actions to end the occupation and ensure peace with justice for Palestinians.

The stance of Ansarullah (the Houthi movement) and the Yemeni people in support of Palestine, especially in the context of their ongoing military operations against Israeli and U.S. forces in the region, is deeply rooted in religious, national, and moral principles. From a geopolitical standpoint, Yemen’s position can be understood through the lens of solidarity with the Palestinian cause, a common stance shared by many in the Middle East who see the Palestinian struggle as one of self-determination and resistance to occupation.

Evaluation of Ansarullah and Yemen's stance:

Religious and Moral Solidarity: Yemen, like many countries in the region, views the Palestinian cause as central to its identity. Ansarullah, representing a significant portion of the Yemeni population, aligns with broader Islamic solidarity in supporting Palestinian resistance. Their actions and rhetoric reflect a commitment to the broader Muslim world’s duty to protect Palestinians, as the Israeli occupation and aggression against Gaza are seen not only as a political issue but as an affront to religious and human dignity.

National Integrity and Resistance to Imperialism: Yemen’s support for Palestine also resonates with a resistance against what it perceives as imperialist powers, primarily the U.S. and its regional allies, including Israel. Yemen has been embroiled in a devastating war for years, facing external intervention, particularly from the Saudi-led coalition. In this context, their support for Palestine is not just about solidarity with Palestinians, but a statement against the regional hegemonies that they see as complicit in the oppression of both Yemen and Palestine. By continuing military operations, Ansarullah underscores its resistance to foreign domination, viewing the Palestinian cause as part of its fight against imperialism and occupation.

Geopolitical Implications: Yemen’s position can be seen as a way to strengthen its alignment with other countries and movements opposed to Israeli and U.S. policies in the region. This includes cooperation with Iran, Hezbollah, and other factions that share similar goals of opposing U.S. influence and Israeli policies. Ansarullah’s military operations against Israeli and U.S. forces in the region aim to signal that their support for Palestine is not merely symbolic, but an active part of their broader resistance against foreign intervention and occupation in the region.

Humanitarian and Moral Duty: The continued blockade and humanitarian crisis in Gaza remain central to Yemen’s support for Palestine. Ansarullah, along with many other political and religious groups in the Middle East, views the suffering of the Palestinian people as a moral imperative. They believe that the global silence and complicity in Israel’s actions should be confronted, and that Yemen’s resistance is an important part of standing in solidarity with those under occupation.

The Role of Ansarullah's Resistance:

Ansarullah’s military actions against Israel and U.S. forces, however controversial, reflect a broader regional strategy of resistance to perceived oppression and occupation. Their military operations are framed not just as retaliation or defense but as part of the ongoing struggle for justice in the Middle East. For many, Ansarullah’s actions are seen as a direct contribution to the Palestinian struggle, especially in the absence of substantial international intervention.

Conclusion:

In summary, Ansarullah’s stance and Yemen’s unwavering support for the Palestinian people can be evaluated as an expression of regional resistance to imperialism, occupation, and injustice. From a moral, national, and religious standpoint, their actions are consistent with a broader tradition of solidarity with the Palestinian cause, while also positioning Yemen as a central actor in the fight against perceived regional powers who uphold the status quo of occupation and aggression.

Their commitment to continue their military operations against Israel and U.S. forces is seen as part of a larger movement in the Middle East that seeks to resist foreign domination, defend Palestinian rights, and assert the right to self-determination. This stance has broad appeal in the Arab world, where support for Palestine remains a rallying cry against occupation and injustice.

Israel’s increasing international isolation due to its actions in Gaza is not only a response to widespread condemnation of its military actions, but also an indication of the deepening moral divide between the Israeli state and much of the global community. Over the past several decades, the Israeli government’s approach to Gaza, including its military campaigns and the ongoing blockade, has drawn intense criticism from human rights organizations, international bodies, and an ever-growing number of governments and civil society movements. The accusations of war crimes and genocide that are being voiced are not only based on the immediate violence of Israel's military actions, but also on its systematic disregard for international law and the humanitarian principles that protect civilians in times of conflict.

The International Response and Growing Isolation:

Widespread Protests and Public Outrage: The millions of people worldwide who have participated in protests against Israel’s actions in Gaza represent a growing sense of collective moral outrage. The protests in Europe, the U.S., and beyond signal that civil society across the globe is waking up to the stark humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The collective voice of the international public, amplified by activists, human rights organizations, and faith-based groups, is calling for accountability and an end to the violence, as well as a long-overdue shift in the international approach to Israel’s occupation of Palestine.

Accusations of Genocide and War Crimes: The term “genocide” is a heavy one, but it is being used more frequently in the context of Gaza because of the scale and nature of the violence. With disproportionate bombings, the targeting of civilian infrastructure, and the destruction of hospitals and schools, Israel’s actions are increasingly being viewed as part of a broader campaign to systematically weaken or eliminate the Palestinian population in Gaza. These accusations of genocide are further compounded by the ongoing blockade, which has trapped Gaza’s population in an unrelenting cycle of poverty, violence, and deprivation, which many argue is a deliberate attempt to erase a people. The UN, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International have all issued reports condemning Israel’s actions as potentially meeting the criteria for war crimes and even genocide.

International Isolation: Israel’s increasing isolation on the global stage is a direct result of these allegations. More countries are questioning their relationships with Israel, especially as public sentiment shifts. Countries that once provided unconditional support are now forced to confront the human rights abuses being carried out in Gaza. Countries in the Global South—many of whom have longstanding ties with Palestine—are vocal in their criticism, with growing calls for diplomatic measures to hold Israel accountable. Global institutions like the UN have become increasingly critical, even as the U.S. and its allies continue to support Israel, though this too is being questioned by their own populations.

The Long-Term Consequences of Isolation: As Israel becomes more isolated, it faces a serious legitimacy crisis. Israel’s continued disregard for international law has undermined its standing among many in the global community, particularly in Europe, where protests are widespread, and Middle Eastern countries, which view Israel as a destabilizing force in the region. The more Israel clings to its military tactics, the more it risks losing the ability to act as a member of the international community. This isolation also threatens Israel’s economic and diplomatic ties with other nations. The increasing global mobilization for Palestinian rights is bringing to light the scale of Israel’s actions and demanding justice.

International Action and Pressure:

What can be done?

Pressure from the International Community: The international community, including governments and international institutions like the UN, must take a stronger stance against Israel’s violations of international law. Israel’s actions should be referred to international courts for accountability, and targeted sanctions could be used as a nonviolent means of pressuring Israel to comply with international law. Governments that continue to support Israel’s actions, particularly the U.S., should be held accountable by their own citizens who are increasingly expressing outrage at their complicity in these human rights violations.

Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS): The BDS movement has gained significant traction, and continues to call for international boycotts of Israeli goods and institutions that are complicit in the occupation and war crimes. The global success of BDS has shown that economic and cultural isolation can be an effective tool in shifting policies and pressuring Israel to comply with international human rights standards.

Support for Palestinian Sovereignty: The international community must support Palestinian self-determination, as well as ending the blockade on Gaza and ensuring the delivery of humanitarian aid. This involves holding Israel accountable for the ongoing blockade, which is a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions, as well as pushing for UN resolutions that demand Israel cease its military aggression in Gaza and allow for Palestinian independence.

Conclusion:

Israel’s increasing isolation in the face of growing international criticism is a natural consequence of its actions in Gaza. The ongoing military campaigns, accusations of genocide, and violations of international law are contributing to a global mobilization for justice for Palestine. The world is calling for Israel to be held accountable for its crimes, and the international community must step up by imposing economic sanctions, increasing diplomatic pressure, and supporting the Palestinian struggle for self-determination. Until the Israeli occupation of Palestine is ended and justice is served, the global isolation of Israel will only deepen. The world can no longer ignore the atrocities being committed and must act in solidarity with the Palestinian people to demand an end to this violence and support the creation of a peaceful and just future for all.