12 years of Netanyahu's extremism
Strengthen the anti-Zionist axis

Tehran (Qodsna) – Ahmadreza Rouhollah Zad- Benjamin Netanyahu was finally ousted from the Zionist regime’s prime ministry after 12 years. Analysts describe his premiership as one of the worst for the regime. Although, apparently the Zionist regime has succeeded to normalize its ties with some Arab regimes, but Netanyahu's actions have strengthened the military and security situation in the region against Israel.

Analysts believe that during Netanyahu's premiership, the more the Zionist government and society moved towards extremism, the more the activities of anti-Zionist groups in Palestine, the region and even the world increased.

The axis of anti-Zionist resistance led by Iran has grown rapidly in the last two decades in military and security dimensions. The resistance in Gaza during this period has changed the balance of the conflict with the Zionist regime, and despite the 16-year air, sea and land siege, it has succeeded in expanding its offensive power. In the recent conflicts, the whole occupied territories has been targeted by resistance missiles and drones.

After the 2006 war, the resistance in Lebanon, according to the Zionist regime's intelligence and security organizations, has expanded its combat capabilities, both quantitatively and qualitatively and also has gained valuable combat experiences by becoming active in the war against Takfiri-Wahhabi terrorists in Syria, Lebanon and the region.

Despite all of Lebanon's internal problems, the resistance has continued to maintain the upper hand in the equation of conflict with the Zionist regime, to the extent that the Zionist army has defined Hezbollah as one of the most important threats.

Meanwhile, the resistance in Yemen also has changed the balance of power despite the 6-year war and the brutal siege, and the leaders of the Yemeni resistance groups have focused their movements on the struggle to liberate Palestine from Zionist occupation and have repeatedly emphasized it at every opportunity.

In Iraq, a popular movement called Hashad al-Shabi has now gained valuable experience and has become a large and efficient force that alone is stronger than the combined armies of several regional countries. The leaders of this group have repeatedly stated that they are waiting for the final war to destroy Israel.

The Islamic Republic of Iran, in spite of all sanctions, has succeeded in various scientific and technical dimensions and has now become the most powerful country in the region and has extended its military presence across the region. All of the Axis of Resistance received assistance from Iran in developing their combat capability. Today, these circles of resistance operate in unison and are able to impose their will on the enemy wherever necessary.

Under Netanyahu, we witnessed some terrorist acts against the interests and personalities of Iran. Assassinations of nuclear scientists, military commanders, sabotage of nuclear facilities and some industrial facilities of the country, terrorist acts against oil and commercial ships, etc., in all of which the Zionists implicitly acknowledged their role. But these actions have never gone unanswered, and both the Zionists and their regional allies, as well as its main supporters, led by the United States, have received responses that in some cases Iran has officially stated that it has played a role in them. In events such as the attack on Ayn al-Assad in Iraq, the attack on Deir ez-Zor in Syria, the downing of the US Triton drone and the seizure of British oil tankers, Iran officially took responsibility.

Of course, in events such as the destruction of the American satellite, the crash of the US intelligence officers' plane in Afghanistan, the continuous attacks on US military bases and convoys in Iraq and Syria, the suspected attacks on Zionist ships, the cyber attacks on Israeli and US infrastructure, the attacks on centers Mossad in Iraq, the suspicious death of some US and Israeli military commanders, etc., although Iran has never claimed responsibility for them, but American and Zionist analysts emphasize that these events are in fact a reaction to the Zionist-American extremism against the resistance.

Analysts believe that if the Netanyahu government had not continued extremism in order to survive at the top of the political structure of the Zionist regime, the regional equation would have been different and the anti-Zionist and anti-American resistance would not have been strengthened to this extent.

Undoubtedly, Israel is in the worst condition in its 73-year history of occupation, and the developments of the last two decades have made the conditions very difficult and dangerous for Israel's survival. Experts believe that if the extremist trend in the Zionist regime continues after Netanyahu (it seems that Naftali Bennett government also will follow Netanyahu's example), Israel should expect worse conditions and developments.