Wednesday 20 January 2021

Reactions pour in after Bolton's dismissal from Trump administration

The firing of National Security Adviser John Bolton by US President Donald Trump has sent shockwaves on social media and been met with a host of mixed reactions in the United States’ political sphere.

As Reported by Qods News Agency (Qodsna) Trump announced Bolton’s dismissal in a tweet on Tuesday, saying he had “disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions,” presumably meaning the hawkish politician’s advocacy for regime change in Syria, Venezuela, North Korea and Iran.


Bolton insisted that he had attempted to resign before Trump’s announcement.


The news swiftly triggered a range of reactions from US officials, with some commenters rejoicing at the war hawk’s departure while others lamenting it.


Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told reporters at the White House that, “the president is entitled to the staff he wants”. However, he declined to answer when he was asked whether Bolton’s departure was prompted

by disagreements between him and Trump over the planned Taliban peace talks.


Another White House official, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, rebuffed the claim that “this national security staff” is "a mess" over Bolton suddenly leaving the administration.


“That’s the most ridiculous question I’ve ever heard,” Mnuchin said.


Senator Bernie Sanders, who is vying for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020, wrote on Twitter that, “a symptom of the problem is gone. The root cause of authoritarianism remains.”


US Senator Elizabeth Warren tweeted, “The American people are better off with John Bolton out of the White House. The world will be better off when the man who hired him in the first place is out too.”


US National Security Adviser John Bolton has been sidelined from sensitive discussions about an emerging peace deal aimed at ending the US war in Afghanistan, US officials say.


Democratic Senator Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that, “It’s emblematic of President Trump’s style. He wants people who basically are yes-men. I may not have agreed with Ambassador Bolton on a whole host of issues and his bellicose views, but the one thing about him is he obviously presented counterviews at times for his (Trump’s) consideration. That’s not something the president wants.”


Democratic US Representative Eliot Engel, chairman of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee, said in a statement, “This firing of the national security advisor is just the latest reminder that the Trump administration’s foreign policy is in complete disarray. ... American leadership is desperately needed around the world. Instead, our national security decision-making process is in chaos and America is less safe.”


Senator Chris Murphy, a Democratic member of the Foreign Relations Committee, noted in a statement, “John Bolton was the wrong choice and the silver lining to this instability is that there will be fewer people whispering war chants in the president’s ear. But no one of any quality is going to take a job in the nation’s national security cabinet so long as everyone’s head is permanently hovering slightly above the chopping block.”


Trump had sometimes joked about Bolton's image as a warmonger, reportedly saying in one Oval Office meeting that "John has never seen a war he doesn't like."


Bolton has adopted an aggressive approach towards Iran since his appointment to the top post by Trump. Independent observers have accused him of conniving with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in order to provoke a military conflict between Iran and the United States.  


A White House spokesman said deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman would fill Bolton’s role on an acting basis.


Related Contents

Netanyahu risks all by placing fate in Trump's hands

Netanyahu risks all by placing fate in Trump's hands

Shortly before Israel’s 2015 elections, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu came to Washington to address a joint session of Congress, going over the heads of the president and the Democratic Party and ignoring criticism from the American and Israeli media and most major Jewish organizations in the United States. He did so for three reasons: A desire to win the elections scheduled for two weeks later, strong hostility toward President Barack Obama and a deep-seated aversion to several world ...


Users Comments


Qods News Agency

©2017 Qods News Agency. All Rights Reserved