Iran counts on Iraqi nation

Al-’Abadi stance was later objected with various reactions from the public opinion of Iraq and many political and religious movements of Iraq (Shiites and Sunnis). Almost all of the public opinion and influential Iraqis have been tweaked by the prime minister, and they are considered this stance in favor of United States interests.

In Iran, official and nonofficial Medias also reacted differently to al-Abadi's allegations.

One of the media outlet which also streams regularly on social networks, attempted to cite Al-Abadi's statements as a result of Iran’s foreign policy mistake.

Recently, one of the Iranian media professionals as an expert on West Asian issues! Published an article in Qods Online (affiliated with Qods Razavi Province), which seems that the content of the article mentioned is more likely a reflection of social networking or media misperceptions that derives from uneducatedness. The mentioned article is full of content that even many of al-Ebadi’s opposition party complained about it. However, the Iraqi elites were able to identify this article and it’s author different from Iran’s policies.

There are major arenas that have to be discussed about such article:

1- “Al-Abadi’s stances are considered to be a great lesson for Iranian administration, that national interests can never be replaced by religious elements.”

The author, influenced by the claims of social networks, evaluates the cooperation of Iran with the Iraqi nation within the framework of the element of religion (Shi'a). Whereas according to all indicators field and the confessions of the takfiri terrorists and some leaders of Arabic regimes (such as Muhammad ibn Salman, the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia) as well as political figures of West (such as Hillary Clinton, the former foreign minister of America) Iran had a major role in fighting against terrorism at the regional level, especially Syria and Iraq, the insecurity of Iran has been an important and fundamental goal. But the author's understanding, unfortunately, could not understand this fact.

2- Al-Abadi's statements proved that "Iraq is not a solid base for Iran".

The Iranian nation has never relied on its own during its full-fledged history. After the Islamic Revolution the principle of "self-reliance" and the same principle 8 years Iranians made their way out of the war alone. Iran today is considered the most powerful and independent country in the region and basically all the actions of United States, Zionist regime and some Arab regimes that are against Iran are to ruin this status of Iran. Iran never had an overlook to Iraq as its military base nor in any other country, but Iran believes that the interests and security of Iran is located in cooperation with neighboring and regional countries. This overlook is accordingly, contrary to the writer's remarks, the Iranian nation is the backbone of many nations and not the opposite.

3. The author as an arrogant judge! The verdict has been issued; "Throughout the years, the Iraqi people have well proved that they are not a reliable nation."

Heydar al-Abbadi is considered as an individual, and he is not even a representative of his own political party, which is called Islamic al-Da’awah. The political group also recently strongly condemned al-Abadi's statements. The author seems to have adopted such positions for a specific purpose and generalization and extension the whole nation of Iraq is far from fairness and also due to the attribution of ignorance in the field of recognizing the Iraqi people and the political, religious and ethnic currents of Iraq. Strong waves of opposition, religious and ethnic movements that opposed the to al-Abbadi in response to his anti-Iranian positions, these facts are the most obvious message for anyone with the least political analysis talents that the Iraqi people are not guilty and the author shouldn’t have insulted them.

Updates in process…