American conspiracy
in Syria And Iran

Unlike the American conceptions, Iran is not facing a two option decision of war or peace, but what Iran is likely to choose is another option called "resistance" and every strategic analyst deeply understands that the results in Syrian war are highly concerning, assuming the end of war.

United States is still holding an operational strategy on Syria, and they have been attempting to perform a coalition of some countries of the region to make a change in Syria. Regardless of its possibility to succeed or fail, it’s more important from two points of view, one is the importance of the future of Syria, and from the other hand the achievements of Resistance movements, due to these two factors in recent weeks there has been an escalation of pressures on Iran from western decision makers and some domestic movements to force Iran to step aside from its current position.

The most effective plan according to the American military is to perform operations based on the coalition of five other forces, including: Turkish Military forces inside Syria, the leftover insurgents from ISIS in Syria, Syrian Kurd tribes, Israeli military forces and a coalition of Arab forces.

The six sided coalition is meant to make changes in Syria from current developments which has led to the stability of Bashar Assad’s government. In this regard the American media outlet Atlantic published an article explaining that how this strategy affects the Geneva peace plan which was backed by UN, US and allies. The Geneva peace plan was based on Assad’s peaceful stepdown from power and to stablish a Transitional government by opposition groups.

James Houmson an analyst writes in foxnews: “This coaltion helps to stop the danger of an Iranian regional hegemony, and this is what all our regional friends agree on.”

There are several things to consider in this regard:

1-Unlike what US decided to pull out forces from Syria, the United States is planning to increase the number of forces from 3000 soldiers.

2-The Americans recently have raised pressures on Saudi Arabia and Egypt to take direct military intervention in Syria, Egyptians so far have not accepted offers from Americans, but Saudi’s are likely to make a decision, in exchange with American support in their war on Yemen. The current domestic crisis of Arab regime clearly shows that they are not in a state of launching abroad missions on the basis of military intervention, but from the other hand there are also not in a situation to give a negative answer to America. Analysts say that the Arab regime such as Egypt don’t trust the new American strategy to be successful, because they are currently witnessing day by day achievements from the Resistance coalition which is gaining more ground in Syria and other conflict zones.

3-Americans truly believe that without presence of Arab forces, their presence in Syria will escalate the hostilities of Muslims against Americans.

4-Like Americans, Turkey also want to drag out Resistance movements from Syria by military invasion, from other hand Turkey also doesn’t want Americans and Arab coalition to remain their presence in Syria, as Turks seek to strengthen their presence and influence in Syria.

5-Unlike the American conceptions, Iran is not facing a two option decision of war or peace, but what Iran is likely to choose is another option called "resistance" and every strategic analyst deeply understands that the results in Syrian war are highly concerning, assuming the end of war. Turkey and Americans are slowly taking steps to test their fate of military intervention, Arab regimes are not capable of sending large amount of forces, and they will have to use the leftovers of the insurgents, these developments are not likely to be a threat to resistance movement. Resistance movement continues to defend the sovereignty of its allied countries and will not surrender.